The Russell Style Indexes categorize the members of the Russell 1000® Index as either “growth,” “value” or some blend of the two. Growth companies are generally considered to be more closely tied to the economic cycle and are valued for their potential future earnings growth. Companies categorized as value generally have discounted market prices relative to their earnings or other fundamental measures.
Style classification of the Russell 1000 constituent companies relies on a defined methodology that uses fundamental characteristics and growth forecasts. Of the 16 forestry products manufacturers that were members of the Russell 1000 Index at the end of 1987, only four remain: Glatfelter (GLT), International Paper Co. (IP), Kimberly-Clark (KMB) and Sonoco Products (SON).
You can see below how the market values of each paper company have fluctuated over the last 30 years. In 1995, KMB completed a $9.4B merger with Scott Paper that paved the way for new growth. Just a year later, IP acquired Federal Paper Board in a deal worth $3.5B. SON and GLT internationalized their operations, but did not strike the type of high-profile deal Gordon Gekko would surely have pushed for.
Gekko sought to identify, by any means necessary, companies with undervalued assets that could be bought and resold at higher prices—making him something of a value investor, albeit one of a morally-challenged kind. Similarly, but ethically, the Russell Style methodology identifies companies exhibiting “value" traits using a set of fundamental indicators.
One of those indicators is adjusted book value-to-share price (adjusted B/P). The adjusted B/P is used to generate a probability of value for every company in the Russell 1000 Index. As an example, we can chart the value probability of KMB over time along with its adjusted B/P. In the chart below, point 1 marks when the company first exhibited value traits. Between 1999 and 2000, point 2 marks the historical peak value probability when KMB’s rising adjusted B/P made the company standout. At that time, most companies’ B/P values were decreasing, leading to what is now referred to as the “dot com bubble.” Points 3 and 4 indicate receding value probability following the financial crisis and some recent accounting charges related to a retirement plan buyout.
Since the debut of Wall Street, and the 30 years that have followed, the Russell Style Indexes have marked the dramatic changes in the US equity market. The forest products industry is just one example of how the Russell Style Indexes can be foundational benchmarks with which to assess or help structure a US equity allocation. These indexes provide accurate reflections of the life cycles that sectors and companies go through. And unlike corporate raiders like Gordon Gekko, the Russell Style indexes use a rules-based and transparent process that does not require illegal insider information. If he’d only had the sense to use a Russell Style index...
For a more detailed analysis of this story, please see the FTSE Russell paper Whatever happened to Teldar Paper?
© 2017 London Stock Exchange Group plc and its applicable group undertakings (the “LSE Group”). The LSE Group includes (1) FTSE International Limited (“FTSE”), (2) Frank Russell Company (“Russell”), (3) FTSE TMX Global Debt Capital Markets Inc. and FTSE TMX Global Debt Capital Markets Limited (together, “FTSE TMX”) and (4) MTSNext Limited (“MTSNext”). All rights reserved.
FTSE Russell® is a trading name of FTSE, Russell, FTSE TMX and MTS Next Limited. “FTSE®”, “Russell®”, “FTSE Russell®” “MTS®”, “FTSE TMX®”, “FTSE4Good®” and “ICB®” and all other trademarks and service marks used herein (whether registered or unregistered) are trade marks and/or service marks owned or licensed by the applicable member of the LSE Group or their respective licensors and are owned, or used under licence, by FTSE, Russell, MTSNext, or FTSE TMX.
All information is provided for information purposes only. Every effort is made to ensure that all information given in this publication is accurate, but no responsibility or liability can be accepted by any member of the LSE Group nor their respective directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors for any errors or for any loss from use of this publication or any of the information or data contained herein.
No member of the LSE Group nor their respective directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors make any claim, prediction, warranty or representation whatsoever, expressly or impliedly, either as to the results to be obtained from the use of the FTSE Russell indexes or the fitness or suitability of the indexes for any particular purpose to which they might be put.
No member of the LSE Group nor their respective directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors provide investment advice and nothing in this communication should be taken as constituting financial or investment advice. No member of the LSE Group nor their respective directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors make any representation regarding the advisability of investing in any asset. A decision to invest in any such asset should not be made in reliance on any information herein. Indexes cannot be invested in directly. Inclusion of an asset in an index is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold that asset. The general information contained in this publication should not be acted upon without obtaining specific legal, tax, and investment advice from a licensed professional.
No part of this information may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission of the applicable member of the LSE Group. Use and distribution of the LSE Group index data and the use of their data to create financial products require a licence from FTSE, Russell, FTSE TMX, MTSNext and/or their respective licensors.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Charts and graphs are provided for illustrative purposes only. Index returns shown may not represent the results of the actual trading of investable assets. Certain returns shown may reflect back-tested performance. All performance presented prior to the index inception date is back-tested performance. Back-tested performance is not actual performance, but is hypothetical. The back-test calculations are based on the same methodology that was in effect when the index was officially launched. However, back- tested data may reflect the application of the index methodology with the benefit of hindsight, and the historic calculations of an index may change from month to month based on revisions to the underlying economic data used in the calculation of the index.