It’s an important issue to investors, so I would like to examine these arguments and counter with other evidence supporting the theory that the small cap premium is indeed alive and well — if you know where to look.
To be or not to be?
It is certainly true that small company stocks have struggled recently in most markets. Since the bottom of the bear market in February 2009 the small cap universe as measured by the Russell 2000 Index has underperformed the large cap universe as measured by the Russell 1000 Index by an annualized 1.17% through February 29, 2016.
While it should be expected that all factors have cycles in which they underperform, some have taken the stance that this cycle of underperformance is evidence that the size premium has either disappeared or was never there to begin with.
Some say that the size premium was simply a liquidity premium in disguise and is now gone as small cap stocks have become more liquid. Others think that the size premium was an illusion caused by the inadequate treatment of delisted stocks. Finally, some believe the increase in the number of small cap funds has crowded out the size premium.
We beg to differ
But new research addresses the doubters with a multi-factor model that shows how analyzing the interaction of the size factor with other factors is critical when seeking the size premium. With this interaction factored in, the size premium emerges strongly in the higher quality, lower volatility corner of the small cap universe.
This research got us to thinking about our own indexes that have been constructed with multi-factor tilts. The Russell 2000 Defensive Index was designed with a tilt toward a combination of high quality and low volatility factors within the small cap universe. We decided to see if we could find support for the results of this new research using our indexes.
It does exist!
The research using the FTSE Russell indexes does indeed support the previous findings. Using factor models we found that the interaction of quality and volatility combined in the Russell 2000 Defensive Index brought out the size premium in strength. This is illustrated most simply in the chart below (Fig. 1).
The difference between the Russell 2000 Defensive and the Russell 1000 Defensive indexes is especially suggestive of a small cap premium as both indexes have quality and volatility factor tilts – the only difference being size. Contrast this with the lack of difference between the Russell 2000 and the Russell 1000 indexes, which are all-inclusive, containing no additional factor tilts.
The interaction of various factors can produce both surprises and new opportunities. Our research not only supports the existence of the small cap premium, but provides further evidence of the potential benefits of using a multi-factor framework.
Fig. 1: FTSE Russell Indexes Performance (June 1996 - September 2015)
 Banz, R., “The Relationship between Market Value and Return of Common stocks,” Journal of Financial Economics, 1981
 These arguments are made in A. Bryan (2014) “Does the Small-Cap Premium Even Exist?” Morningstar and V. Kalesnik and N. Beck (2014), “Busting the Myth About Size.” Research Affiliates.
 C. Asness, A . Frazzini, R. Israel, T. Moskowitz, and L. Pedersen (2015) “Size Matters, If You Control Your Junk” AQR.
 “Getting Defensive About the Small Cap Premium” FTSE Russell Research (2016).
FTSE Russell® is a trading name of FTSE, Russell, FTSE TMX and MTS Next Limited. “FTSE®”, “Russell®”, “FTSE Russell®” “MTS®”, “FTSE TMX®”, “FTSE4Good®” and “ICB®” and all other trademarks and service marks used herein (whether registered or unregistered) are trade marks and/or service marks owned or licensed by the applicable member of the LSE Group or their respective licensors and are owned, or used under licence, by FTSE, Russell, MTSNext, or FTSE TMX.
All information is provided for information purposes only. Every effort is made to ensure that all information given in this publication is accurate, but no responsibility or liability can be accepted by any member of the LSE Group nor their respective directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors for any errors or for any loss from use of this publication or any of the information or data contained herein.
No member of the LSE Group nor their respective directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors make any claim, prediction, warranty or representation whatsoever, expressly or impliedly, either as to the results to be obtained from the use of the FTSE Russell indexes or the fitness or suitability of the indexes for any particular purpose to which they might be put.
No member of the LSE Group nor their respective directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors provide investment advice and nothing in this communication should be taken as constituting financial or investment advice. No member of the LSE Group nor their respective directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors make any representation regarding the advisability of investing in any asset. A decision to invest in any such asset should not be made in reliance on any information herein. Indexes cannot be invested in directly. Inclusion of an asset in an index is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold that asset. The general information contained in this publication should not be acted upon without obtaining specific legal, tax, and investment advice from a licensed professional.
No part of this information may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission of the applicable member of the LSE Group. Use and distribution of the LSE Group index data and the use of their data to create financial products require a license from FTSE, Russell, FTSE TMX, MTSNext and/or their respective licensors.