By: Mat Lystra, Sr. Research Analyst
As people look for reasons to explain the latest bout of volatility in China’s equity market, many have wondered aloud if the modern equivalents of those ancient rods have been broken, yielding data about the Chinese economy that is flawed. And what might that mean for users of China indexes in particular?
China developed one of the earliest systems of mathematics, using rods arranged in specific directions to count in 1s and 10s. This simple but effective method allowed for advancements in the measurement of trade, farming output and other government interests.
Metal counting rods from the period of the Han DynastySource: http://kaleidoscope.cultural-china.com/
If you’re among those that believe China is somehow getting its notorious 7% GDP growth figure wrong, there’s probably little any blog post can do to change your mind. But whether someone is using 3000 year old ivory counting rods, or present-day computing systems, accounting for the national output of an economy the size of China’s is surely a challenging and imprecise task. Consider that even GDP figures for the US and other advanced economies are often revised multiple times over months and years before they are considered “final”.
In addition to GDP-related figures, China’s National Bureau of Statistics produces a series of purchasing manager’s indexes (PMI) that are split between manufacturing and non-manufacturing related activities. The top-line manufacturing and non-manufacturing PMI figures can be used as a check against reported GDP growth. If the data series (GDP growth and PMI activity) are consistent, then perhaps China’s GDP numbers are a fair representation of the how the country’s economy is performing.
As shown below, the PMI data for 2015 paints a mixed picture of manufacturing decline partially offset by growth for non-manufacturing activities. China reported that the services sector, the non-manufacturing portion of the economy, contributed to half of GDP in 2015 – a first for the country. Equally weighting the performance of both PMI measures points to a dip in activity that is directionally consistent with modest declines in GDP growth.
One-year change for China’s Economic Indicators
Source: National Bureau of Statistics, December 2015. *Difference in YoY GDP Growth rate
GDP has become important not just to economists and politicians, but to index users as well. A derivative of GDP, Gross National Income (GNI) per capita, is used as an input to FTSE Russell’s Country Classification System. Additionally, some index users prefer to weight countries based on their economic footprint instead of their equity market size. Often a developing country’s economic growth can outpace its market value growth, leading to a disproportionately small representation within traditional cap weighted benchmarks.
In order to “right-size” these countries, some index users will choose a GDP weighted structure like that offered through the FTSE GDP Weighted Index Series. This series breaks the conventional link between country weightings and equity market size. In the case of China, according to the IMF the country has a GDP of approximately $19T, but a total market size of only about $3T; as compared to the US with a GDP of approaching $18T but a total market size of approximately $25T!
So whether you believe China’s economy is experiencing a soft landing or full-blown stall, FTSE’s GDP Weighted Indexes would suggest there’s still plenty of room for the country to grow when compared to its weighting within cap weighted indexes.
 Cendrowski, S. (2016). China’s Real GDP Growth Figure is Less Than 6.9%. Fortune accessed on 1/22/2016 at: http://fortune.com/2016/01/19/chinas-real-gdp-growth-figure-is-less-than-6-9/
 Fraher, J. & Micklethwait, J. (2016). China to Remain Global Growth Engine, Vice President Li Says. Bloomberg accessed on 1/22/2016 at: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-01-21/china-to-remain-global-growth-engine-vice-president-li-says
 Source: International Monetary Fund’s 2014 World Economic Outlook report..
© 2016 London Stock Exchange Group companies.
London Stock Exchange Group companies includes FTSE International Limited (“FTSE”), Frank Russell Company (“Russell”), MTS Next Limited (“MTS”), and FTSE TMX Global Debt Capital Markets Inc (“FTSE TMX”). All rights reserved.
“FTSE®”, “Russell®”, “MTS®”, “FTSE TMX®” and “FTSE Russell” and other service marks and trademarks related to the FTSE or Russell indexes are trade marks of the London Stock Exchange Group companies and are used by FTSE, MTS, FTSE TMX and Russell under licence.
All information is provided for information purposes only. Every effort is made to ensure that all information given in this publication is accurate, but no responsibility or liability can be accepted by the London Stock Exchange Group companies nor its licensors for any errors or for any loss from use of this publication.
Neither the London Stock Exchange Group companies nor any of their licensors make any claim, prediction, warranty or representation whatsoever, expressly or impliedly, either as to the results to be obtained from the use of the FTSE Russell indexes or the fitness or suitability of the indexes for any particular purpose to which they might be put.
The London Stock Exchange Group companies do not provide investment advice and nothing in this article should be taken as constituting financial or investment advice. The London Stock Exchange Group companies make no representation regarding the advisability of investing in any asset. A decision to invest in any such asset should not be made in reliance on any information herein. Indexes cannot be invested in directly. Inclusion of an asset in an index is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold that asset. The general information contained in this publication should not be acted upon without obtaining specific legal, tax, and investment advice from a licensed professional.
No part of this information may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission of the London Stock Exchange Group companies. Distribution of the London Stock Exchange Group companies’ index values and the use of their indexes to create financial products require a licence with FTSE, FTSE TMX, MTS and/or Russell and/or its licensors.
The Industry Classification Benchmark (“ICB”) is owned by FTSE. FTSE does not accept any liability to any person for any loss or damage arising out of any error or omission in the ICB.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Charts and graphs are provided for illustrative purposes only. Index returns shown may not represent the results of the actual trading of investable assets. Certain returns shown may reflect back-tested performance. All performance presented prior to the index inception date is back-tested performance. Back-tested performance is not actual performance, but is hypothetical. The back-test calculations are based on the same methodology that was in effect when the index was officially launched. However, back- tested data may reflect the application of the index methodology with the benefit of hindsight, and the historic calculations of an index may change from month to month based on revisions to the underlying economic data used in the calculation of the index.