By: Mat Lystra, Sr. Research Analyst
I will be the first to acknowledge that emerging markets have fallen on hard times: heightened volatility, currency depreciation vs. the U.S. dollar, and political unrest have all conspired to cast a pall over the asset class.
Especially hard hit have been China, Russia and Brazil, which make up three-fourths of the historically high-flying “BRICs” group of markets, and 50.4% of the FTSE Emerging (markets) Index. The recent poor performance of emerging markets has led some to suggest that cap-weighted benchmarks and the products that track them have growth too heavy in countries like China and should be avoided.
Instead, many of the products offered by critics of cap-weighted benchmarks promise all of the attractive qualities of emerging markets while being able to avoid any unwanted side-effects. These claims remind me of those extreme weight loss advertisements promising results simply by taking a pill when a balanced diet and regular exercise have always been a prescription for good health.
Broad based cap-weighted indexes represent the naïve view of the market—or so critics would say—by including all investable countries and stocks. In doing so, the benchmark provides index users with a proportionate representation of countries and stocks as valued by the market at a point in time.
What cap-weighted naysayers might fail to see is that this method of index construction can in fact benefit the user who is making allocation decisions or investing in a product that tracks the index. Why? Because by including countries like China and Russia even when they are out of favor, broad-based benchmarks can provide a “balanced diet” of diversification.
As an example, Figure 1 shows the last 12 months of performance (total returns USD) for the all-cap versions of the FTSE Brazil, Russia, India, and China indexes, as well as the FTSE Developed Index. To varying degrees, each emerging country behaves differently from every other and from developed markets. This is the essence of diversification. While Russian stocks were hit hard by geopolitical concerns and a massive currency devaluation to end-2014, Chinese stocks were setting all-time highs. More recently India has taken some of the edge off China’s negative performance and had the lowest volatility among the BRICs.
And for those who now consider cap-weighted indexes a little too heavy in their weightings of certain countries, I’d ask them to consider the growth in emerging markets in just the last ten years. From 2005 through 2014 the market cap of emerging markets grew from $4.6T to $15T, an annual growth rate of approximately 12.6%. But take out the BRIC countries and you would have had less than half as much growth.
Look, I’m not sure which emerging markets will lead the way in the future – that’s why I don’t sell magic pills. But I know that diversification can work and that the FTSE Emerging Index captures the investable opportunity set of a diverse group of countries and stocks. I also know that sticking to a balanced diet is often hard, which is perhaps why cap-weighted emerging markets benchmarks are useful tools now more than ever.
 FactSet as of September 30, 2014
According to index weighting by market value
World Federation of Exchanges as of November 30, 2015
 Includes all countries classified as Emerging markets by FTSE as of September 2015
© 2015 London Stock Exchange Group companies.
London Stock Exchange Group companies includes FTSE International Limited (“FTSE”), Frank Russell Company (“Russell”), MTS Next Limited (“MTS”), and FTSE TMX Global Debt Capital Markets Inc (“FTSE TMX”). All rights reserved.
“FTSE®”, “Russell®”, “MTS®”, “FTSE TMX®” and “FTSE Russell” and other service marks and trademarks related to the FTSE or Russell indexes are trade marks of the London Stock Exchange Group companies and are used by FTSE, MTS, FTSE TMX and Russell under licence.
All information is provided for information purposes only. Every effort is made to ensure that all information given in this publication is accurate, but no responsibility or liability can be accepted by the London Stock Exchange Group companies nor its licensors for any errors or for any loss from use of this publication.
Neither the London Stock Exchange Group companies nor any of their licensors make any claim, prediction, warranty or representation whatsoever, expressly or impliedly, either as to the results to be obtained from the use of the FTSE Russell indexes or the fitness or suitability of the indexes for any particular purpose to which they might be put.
The London Stock Exchange Group companies do not provide investment advice and nothing in this article should be taken as constituting financial or investment advice. The London Stock Exchange Group companies make no representation regarding the advisability of investing in any asset. A decision to invest in any such asset should not be made in reliance on any information herein. Indexes cannot be invested in directly. Inclusion of an asset in an index is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold that asset. The general information contained in this publication should not be acted upon without obtaining specific legal, tax, and investment advice from a licensed professional.
No part of this information may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission of the London Stock Exchange Group companies. Distribution of the London Stock Exchange Group companies’ index values and the use of their indexes to create financial products require a licence with FTSE, FTSE TMX, MTS and/or Russell and/or its licensors.
The Industry Classification Benchmark (“ICB”) is owned by FTSE. FTSE does not accept any liability to any person for any loss or damage arising out of any error or omission in the ICB.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Charts and graphs are provided for illustrative purposes only. Index returns shown may not represent the results of the actual trading of investable assets. Certain returns shown may reflect back-tested performance. All performance presented prior to the index inception date is back-tested performance. Back-tested performance is not actual performance, but is hypothetical. The back-test calculations are based on the same methodology that was in effect when the index was officially launched. However, back- tested data may reflect the application of the index methodology with the benefit of hindsight, and the historic calculations of an index may change from month to month based on revisions to the underlying economic data used in the calculation of the index.